Doubting Sam

Here is a blogger who takes a cynical view on time travel, but is clever enough to devise his own theory-prover-thingy.

Tardis Hopping

OK, what the hell???

Look above me! That damn "Doubting Sam" post is still there! I'm writing in the past! Or I wrote that entry in future. But if I did write that in the future, then I wouldn't be able to see it until 7:41 PM. So, I guess I wrote that and then traveled into the past to write these three. Am I nuts? I don't think so. I think I time traveled! I mean, here I am writing about time travel. Why wouldn't I actually do it? Was I abducted like Arthur and have had some sort of memory-erase so that I don't remember how I got here? Will I just keep going on this track, in this dimension, forgetting completely about my other track that I left to get here?

Wait, maybe I ought to read that "Doubting Sam" post. (I'm not even going to link to it because it's right above this one!) Sam does talk about a fool-proof way to discover whether or not time travel works. I rifled through my wallet looking for the damned "Personal Disproof of Time Travel" document, but found nothing. So, if I really did go into the past, then I guess my past self gave up waiting and went around the corner for a smoothie. Maybe I should run out to Juice Generation and see if I'm there. I wonder what kind of smoothie I got? Would it be the same I would choose if I went out there right now? I mean, I don't feel any different...

I think I'm too freaked out by my inadvertent time travel to continue this project. I think it's time to end. There I go referring to "time" again. Seems we can't ever get away from it. A stitch in it saves nine somehow. It will tell. It heals everything. Some----s, we're right in the nick of it. Some----s, it flies. But instead of killing it, as I think in my case it's borrowed, I have none to lose to get back to where I came from. So, let's just say I'm ahead of mine and call it a human day. I'll think I'll choose mango with a little protein powder in it...


Oh, and for the record, I guess this now counts as its own travel blog.

Strange

OK, the weirdest thing just happened.

It is right now 8:15 PM Tuesday 16 January 2007.

I have been writing a few posts this evening about Arthur's blog. Before that I posted what was a draft of the "Doubting Sam" post, which I had originally written on 8 January 2007. When I published it to the blog, it actually appeared chronologically on 8 January, not, as I had thought it would, at the top of my blog. (That's not the weird part.)

So, under Post Options, I changed the Post Date & Time to 1/16/07 @ 7:41 PM—the exact real time. That did the trick. It brought the post to the top of the blog. Perfect.

So, then I go on writing those couple of posts about Arthur's blog: More from the Real Thing and Real Time Travel. When I posted them, "Doubting Sam" was still on top. "What the hell?," I thought. I went to my post list and saw that the two most recent were posted at 16:43 and 17:06, respectively, a good three hours BEFORE "Doubting Sam." For the record, it is now 8:25 PM. Read the post time below. (I'm guessing it will be different...)

Real Time Travel

How did you read the title? Real time travel or real time travel? I'm just curious. This is the name of Arthur's blog address: realtimetravel.blogspot.com. I didn't even register the first possible reading of that name. I was about to write a post on how intriguing it was that Arthur called his type of travel "real time." And perhaps it still is. His version, or understanding, of time is different from ours. He is challenging our thinking. If he intended that his was "real" time travel, then, while true, it is less clever. And perhaps I'm just an idiot.

More from the Real Thing

As you read Arthur's blog, you will find some difficult challenges to his separate dimension theory. He theorizes that if you go back in time and make changes to the past, you will create another dimension which contains those changes. But the original trajectory of history will continue on as it was. Therefore, you cannot go back in time and kill your grandfather, for example, thereby eliminating the possibility of your existence. (This is an oft-used argument in the discussions of time travel.)

Arthur claims to be using knowledge he gained in the future to come back to our present to affect change that will help the human race. But if he does so, there will still be a dimension which allows humankind to continue barreling down the self-destructive path it's on. And, I ask, from what point do you measure these other dimensions? If we can indeed travel through time, there might be an infinite number of branches of time, as a result of the tiniest affectation a visitor from the future can have from even an instantaneous appearance in the past.

Analysis Now

I wrote an in-depth analysis of The Time Traveller. But then came back from the future and deleted it.

Comix

Da Travla

Did you check him out? Arthur, I mean?


No, not THAT Arthur.


Not THAT Arthur either.

Arthur Carlin. The Time Traveller. He is mysterious. You may have noticed. He is self-admittedly vague.

Arthur Carlin

• Age: 36
• Gender: male
• Astrological Sign: Libra
• Zodiac Year: Dog
• Industry: Science
• Occupation: Time Traveller
• Location: Milwaukee : Wisconsin : United States

About Me

I am a time traveller using this forum to help my home dimension evolve in the best manner possible.

Interests

• Astronomy
• quantum physics
• sociology
• jazz
• piano
• guitar.

Favorite Movies

• Not yet filmed!

Favorite Music

• Classic jazz. Anything with a great pianist.

Favorite Books

• Slaughterhouse 5.

Blogs

	Blog Name
	The Time Traveller

Who IS this man of mystery?

Is it him?
Is it him?

Do either of these men look like time travelers to you?


Does she?

Marco!

Polo!

Where the hell is Chris going with all this, you might ask? Time travel? I mean, really.


Well, I had exhausted (maybe not exhausted, exactly, but finished with, perhaps) several different aspects of travel (excluding 13th Century exploration) and wanted to wind up my project in some clever way. THAT'S when I thought of time travel. I didn't go into space travel, of course, to boldly blog where no man has blogged before... Because I thought that might be difficult to fill with electronic journalism. Whereas time travel had the actual possibility of being an actual possibility. Therefore, a blog about time travel had the same probability of existence.

All this to say... I found a blog written by a real, live time traveler. I kid you not. It is even called "The Time Traveller," in case you had any doubts. Give it a once-over. Start at the bottom. Fascinating. Who knew?

Animotion

You are an obsession
You're my obsession
Who do you want me to be
To make you sleep with me
You are an obsession
You're my obsession
Who do you want me to be
To make you sleep with me

My fantasy has turned to madness
All my goodness has turned to badness
My need to possess you has consumed
my soul
My life is trembling I have no control

I will have you
Yes I will have you
I will find a way and I will have you
Like a butterfly
A wild butterfly
I will collect you and capture you

Travelocity

Well, I went to our old friend Wikipedia to read about time travel. Yikes. Technical, technical, technical. I went up to Advanced Physics in my high school Science Honors Program, but still... From wormholes and time dilation to cosmic string and the Roman ring... it all sounds dirty, uh, Greek to me. (By the way, that's a Roman ring with two wormholes over there to the right...)


Don't get me started on the chronology protection conjecture. Don't even get me started. (No, really. I can barely say it.) And can we tawk about Stephen Hawking? This lengthy Wikipedia time travel entry tends to portray the naysayer in him. He seems to downplay the whole idea—the Wikipedians constantly quoting his negative views on time travel—like: if we could, why haven't we met any time travelers? I mean, the man is a brilliant physical theorist, as we all know. I just think it is interesting (and worth paying attention to) that he doesn't have huge amounts of encouraging words about time travel. (And do remember I've done incredibly superficial research about this.)

Somewhere in the entries, a contributor wrote about methods of time travel in literature:

"The most commonly used method of time travel in science fiction is the instantaneous movement from one point in time to another, like using the controls on a CD player to skip to a previous or next song, though in most cases, there is a machine of some sort, and some energy expended in order to make this happen (Like the DeLorean in Back to the Future or the phonebooth and the circuits of time in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure)."

Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure? Who knew? Clearly, I'm missing out on some prime popular culture. Shoot THAT to the top of your Netlflix queue, why dontcha? Push aside both the 1960 and 2002 filmed versions of H.G. Wells' The Time Machine (1895) and chew through some classic Keanu. Excellent!

It is sad that I get stymied by the scientific and buoyed by the popular. I like to think of myself as intellectually curious, looking at the world from out in space, trying to decipher it all. And yet I can't resist including a picture of Papa Smurf in my blog.

The last I'll write about the Wikipedia nonsense is to point out the five links at the bottom of the entry, entitled Claims of Time Travel. The most comprehensive was about one John Titor from the year 2036. Here's the actual website.

And you should all know that the time travel entry begins with all sorts of Warnipedias:

1. This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims
2. This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.
3. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

Really fills with you with confidence in its content, eh?

Oh, and just in case you were wondering what the hell that artwork is at the top of this post:

Artist's impression of a wormhole as seen by an observer crossing the event horizon of a Schwarzschild wormhole, which is similar to a Schwarzschild black hole but with the singularity replaced by an unstable path to a white hole in another universe. The observer originates from the right, and another universe becomes visible in the center of the wormhole shadow once the horizon is crossed. This new region is however unreachable in the case of a Schwarzschild wormhole, as the bridge between the black hole and white hole will always collapse before the observer has time to cross it. See White Holes and Wormholes for a more technical discussion and animation of what an observer sees when falling into a Schwarzschild wormhole.

Clear?

Not Far Now

That was always the answer to the travel-weary question: How much farther, Papa Smurf?

It is also the answer by Apple (née Apple Computer) to the question of Time Travel. In fact, in the sneak peek at the new Mac OS X: Leopard, there is a video presentation about a new feature called Time Machine.

"With Time Machine, you can go back in time, find what you need, then restore everything with a single click. Time Machine finds and restores anything on your system...It can even reunite you with old friends...Your memories are never far away. A quick trip into your system's past and they're back with a click. Time is on your side—with Leopard."

While Time Machine only allows us to travel into the past, Apple's recent technological shove into the future is the iPhone—an iPod, a phone and an Internet communicator all-in-one—which "ushers in an era of software power and sophistication never before seen in a mobile device, completely redefining what you can do on a mobile phone."

Should we consider Apple, Inc. one of this world's innovators in time travel? What other Top Secret plans are they hatching in their laboratories? Calling Max and 99...

Who's on First?

Well, Who's on BBC-America, actually. Doctor Who, I mean.

That is the Doctor and Rose watching the end of the world (our world), which is about to be fried as the sun turns into a red giant five billion years from now. Makes you think. Below is a picture of the last surviving human, just a stretch of skin with eyes and a mouth, in constant need of hydration (that's what the goonies are for) and with her brain floating in a jar beneath. Her physical state is the result of many plastic surgeries, not a result of five billion years of evolution. Her name's Cassandra, by the way.


I offer you this glimpse into the future, albeit one created by Russell T. Davies, in order to warm you up to the idea of my last chapter of travel writing: time travel. One of our greatest and most celebrated and longest-running time travelers is Doctor Who. In order to begin delving into time travel, I watched the entire first season (2005) of Doctor Who which I had recorded from BBC- America. I wanted ideas, perspectives, direction. While thoroughly entertaining (thoroughly!), it didn't give me too much of what I was looking for. I, of course, am studying travel writing. This was pure fantastic time travel. The series is great because it takes the time to allow for small revelations and understandings from the Doctor's new sidekick, Rose, who stumbles upon him—mid-mission—and joins him in his travels. As she slowly wraps her mind around the concept of time travel, we are right there with her. It is a difficult concept for us "linear time" beings to grasp. And, with my project in mind, how do you write about it? You can't really send postcards from the future, now can you? And can you even record your travels? If you visit the past, might that not change the future and, therefore, any entries you might have written about those travels, too? I guess we still have to get out of that timeline frame of mind.

So, onto the Internet, which has the answers to everything.

Eat Out

We often travel in pursuit of cuisine.